Friday, March 30, 2007

 

Adoption and Morality


.
While some have no problem condemning homosexuality as immoral and catholic adoption agencies ban gays from adopting...and, while many of the same people also have very strong opinions about the use of embryos for stem cell research....

Theologians and ethicists - including the Catholic Church - are reportedly split over the morality of embryo adoptions through which embryos left over from in vitro fertilization are implanted into the uterus of a woman other than the biological mother.


The Catholic Church has yet to issue any authoritative teaching on embryo adoptions, said Peter J. Cataldo, an ethical consultant to the Philadelphia-based National Catholic Bioethics Center.

At issue is what may morally be done to the excess embryos created through in vitro fertilization and frozen for possible later use. Over the years, many have been discarded while some have been adopted [read:SOLD!]. Delaware’s General Assembly has been considering a bill that would allow their use for embryonic stem-cell research. The church opposes any such research since harvesting the stem cells would destroy the embryos.

The church teaches that in vitro fertilization is not morally acceptable because the egg and sperm are joined outside of sexual intercourse between a husband and wife. The 1987 document “On Respect for Human Life” (“Donum Vitae”) from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, noted that through in vitro fertilization, “(T)he generation of the human person is objectively deprived of its proper perfection: namely, that of being the result and fruit of a conjugal act.”

Those who believe embryo adoption to be illicit follow a similar argument.

“Pregnancy is indiscernibly related to marriage” and “must be the fruit of husband and wife,” said Father Tadeusz Pacholczyk, staff ethicist for the National Catholic Bioethics Center. Since an embryo adoption involves implanting a woman with the fruit of another couple, he said, “my own opinion is that it is not moral to do this.”

BUT, if the insist on calling it "adoption" what is the difference between this and raising the child of another?

The issue they are totally missing (avoiding?) is the fact that these frozen embryos are being SOLD! If they are human beings, than that is slavery! if they are not human, than clearly it is NOT adoption. Can't have it both ways, can we???

Comments:
It appears the RC church has tripped itself up with this one.Implanting a woman with the embryos of another couple is "adultery' but then it is also supposedly 'adoption'....and even 'saving a life'

The RC Church considers sexual intercourse to be the "marriage act' and forbids all sexual activity that does not end in sexual intercourse.

Children are supposed to be conceived in marriage, and only in an act of sexual intercourse.

Oh, well, I guess the rest of us will just have to bear up as best we can...ha ha.
 
Additionally, there is the problem of the lying. How many catholic embryo adopters are going to tell 'their children" the true story.. And the state-issued birth certificate will surely have the names of the Catholic purchasers...not the names of the "donors"....listed on the one and only birth certificate.

And if the child ever finds out the truth...whatever will be said then???This will be a bigger mess than traditional adoption ever was.

(and it is starting already)
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Blogging Birthmothers